<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO by Keli &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seobykeli.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seobykeli.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:50:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Cuil Cool?</title>
		<link>http://www.seobykeli.com/2008/07/is-cuil-cool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seobykeli.com/2008/07/is-cuil-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobykeli.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Cuil debuted&#8230; a new search engine that has been touted as possible threat to Google.  I&#8217;m not sure about that last bit&#8230; it seems like Yahoo or MSN would have overtaken the giant first, but you never know.  That&#8217;s one of the things that make this industry exciting.
Cuil seemed to be getting more of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today <a href="http://www.cuil.com/" target="_blank">Cuil</a> debuted&#8230; a new search engine that has been touted as possible threat to Google.  I&#8217;m not sure about that last bit&#8230; it seems like Yahoo or MSN would have overtaken the giant first, but you never know.  That&#8217;s one of the things that make this industry exciting.</p>
<p>Cuil seemed to be getting more of a bad rap than good one around the SEO forums/blogs today.  I tried some queries myself and wasn&#8217;t that impressed&#8230; but it&#8217;s the first day right?  I put in one of my phrases only to see my cilent&#8217;s banner come up with an unrelated site (on a result that wasn&#8217;t my site).  My site came up with some strange graphic I had never seen before.  When I put in a client&#8217;s main phrase, her banner showed up on a competitors site &#8211; Oi. I tried another query, then clicked the &#8220;2&#8243; at the bottom of the page and got a &#8220;page not found&#8221; type of message. The layout is certainly different from what we&#8217;re used to.  It seems unbalanced and that bothers my neurotic mind. One of their big claims is having more pages indexed than any other engine.. but a bag full of trash is a bag full of trash.  I never did get the &#8220;I have more pages indexed than you&#8221; battle.  There was also a mention that Cuil doesn&#8217;t put a lot of emphasis on backlinks.</p>
<p>Hopefully these are all just growing pains.  It&#8217;s nice to have competition out there, keeps everyone on their toes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seobykeli.com/2008/07/is-cuil-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Flash going to be sharing the love?</title>
		<link>http://www.seobykeli.com/2008/07/is-flash-going-to-be-sharing-the-love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seobykeli.com/2008/07/is-flash-going-to-be-sharing-the-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 03:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crawlable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indexable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seobykeli.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of buzz about Adobe going to lengths to get Flash indexed, crawled, read, etc by the search engines.  This includes navigation, links and *everything in between*.  Images will still have issues as they contain no text&#8230; but other bits might be open for business.
Links:
http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080701-095415
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/improved-flash-indexing.html
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/google-learns-to-crawl-flash.html
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of buzz about Adobe going to lengths to get Flash indexed, crawled, read, etc by the search engines.  This includes navigation, links and *everything in between*.  Images will still have issues as they contain no text&#8230; but other bits might be open for business.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p>http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080701-095415</p>
<p>http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/06/improved-flash-indexing.html</p>
<p>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/google-learns-to-crawl-flash.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seobykeli.com/2008/07/is-flash-going-to-be-sharing-the-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
